Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Gruhn (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Gruhn[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reasons as first deletion. Doesn't meet GNG. Refbombed with sports statistics and primary refs to the subject's school. Only decent looking ref is a DL to a NatGeo piece I can't find. Nswix (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts. Nswix (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable as a coach or competitor, the jiujitsutimes references used in the article describe him as academy owner and instructor. Lewolka (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete,Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 13:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notable. He has competed nationally and internationally. Has instructional videos on BJJ Fanatics. Is coach to multiple notable fighters. Mmareg (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited. Also having a couple instructionals on BJJFanatics and "competing nationally and internationally" doesn't prove notability unless you're a world champion in a competition like ADCC or IBJJF. Nswix (talk) 18:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see anything that shows he meet he's more notable now than he was at the previous AfD. He doesn't appear to meet any SNG and he seems to lack the significant independent coverage that meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 23:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.