Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthellen Josselson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthellen Josselson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. suspected WP:AUTOBIO. created by a single purpose editor and then curiously worked on by Rjosselson (talk · contribs). LibStar (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a reluctant keep since there is clear evidence of COI. But the Fulbright Fellowship is a pretty major award. It satisfies WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. I am less sure about the other two awards. But the Fulbright is sufficient on its own. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Having regard in particular to various published works - notability satisfied --Zymurgy (talk) 19:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fullbright is not sufficient to pass WP:Prof but 15 publications with over 100 cites on GS is. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Besides the clear pass of WP:PROF#C1 mentioned by Xxanthippe, she is a fellow of the American Psychological Association (mentioned here though not in our article) which I think is enough for #C3 (unlike the two fellowships we mention). Has User:Rjosselson been told not to edit her own article? She should be. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.