Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Thorne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ruth Thorne[edit]
- Ruth Thorne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
After doing some basic cleanup on the page, what we're left with seems to be a promotional piece for a non-notable author. While there are several citations, the only readily-verifiable one (the imls.gov one) is for a mentor of the subject, which makes no mention of the subject. The next closest one is only a listing of a radio station; it does not provide necessary info such as the program name, date, etc., and it's not clear that it was a notable appearance. I'm listing this as failing WP:V. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete there appears to be no copy of her books in a US/Canadian library, but that is not the same conclusive proof of non-=notability as an author as it would be for a book in english by a US or Canadian or UK author. DGG (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless better references can be provided quickly. Deb (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely unverifiable, bordering on possible hoax. A Google search finds a grand total of 1 mention of her Cronicas del Barrio (not counting the Wikipedia article); a WorldCat search finds nothing relevant. None of the other books mentioned in the article seem to exist either. Hardly indicative of "great success" in publishing. Hqb (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable author Letsdrinktea (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.