Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Geoffrey Banks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 01:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Russell Geoffrey Banks[edit]
- Russell Geoffrey Banks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unknown actor, never had notable roles. Fails to meet WP:ARTIST by a mile. Created by single-purpose account User:Chezleblanc, likely conflict of interest. bender235 (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete despite such memorable roles as "Portuguese Soldier" and "Fleeing Businessman (uncredited)". Clarityfiend (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- keep he is on over 100.000 websites for film ... and has worked on some the biggest films and commercials in 2009 to 2011.. no brainer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chezleblanc (talk • contribs) 22:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON, at best. Being a stand-in does not a notability make, nor does having only minor descriptive roles,[1] even if in notable productions. And I note that his asserted involvement in many of the articles claimed productions fails verifiability. Failing WP:ENT we then look to WP:GNG... and see he has no coverage in reliable sources,[2] even if searchable in thousands of non-reliable websites.[3] Wikipedia is not the place to host his resume. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.