Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russ Miller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 17:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russ Miller[edit]

Russ Miller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After looking at WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG, I think this is a borderline case, but I couldn't quite establish that he meets the criteria through reliable sources. There were lots of websites which mention him, many using the same wording as his personal website. He seems to be successful within his field, and I considered whether he might meet WP:MUSICBIO #1, but I'm not sure it's quite there. As this has been tagged for notability for seven years, I thought it best to bring it to AfD now and resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.