Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Dover

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 April 30.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 October 29.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 October 18.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Dover[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no honest grounds for having an article of this subject: A police officer of marginal notability (few Ghits). The article is a stub destined as an attack page, or a form of doxing. Since this person is commanding officer of anti-riot police who anti-ELAB protesters hold directly responsible for the decision to launch teargas, rubber bullets, and other ballistic anti-rioting weaponry against protesters, he has become a hate figure and has been subject to vilification and personal attacks in Hong Kong. Some examples of the attacks can be seen clearly in this article. I therefore nominate this article for deletion. Ohc ^¡digame! 20:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - It's a disgraceful cyber manhunt, should have been nominated for G10 speedy deletion. STSC (talk) 20:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article is largely coat racking about the current protests in Hong Kong. Nothing justifies an article on this person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.