Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Bowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Bowers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable barrister: specifically failing WP:GNG. No evidence of significant coverage of Bowers in reliable sources. He is mentioned in connection to events, but there is no coverage of him. —C.Fred (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United Kingdom. —C.Fred (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find him mentioned as counsel in many cases, some quite high profile, but I am unable to find significant coverage about him that would support inclusion of this article. -- Whpq (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.