Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules and Regulations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (Notability established per consensus). Non admin closure Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rules and Regulations[edit]
- Rules and Regulations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced non-notable album from potentially non-notable artist. [1] Wisdom89 (T / C) 07:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Gary King (talk) 09:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep album has been reviewed by the BBC, The Guardian and Fact. This constitutes non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject, thereby satisfying WP:N. скоморохъ 13:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The band is notable for having charted in the UK twice; therefore, their album is notable too per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Skomorokh and TenPoundHammer and his otters. tomasz. 19:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The album appears notable, especially considering consensus appears to be that the artist is notable. Maxamegalon2000 23:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The band is notable, the album has a suitable level of coverage to merit an article. --Sturm 13:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.