Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rulers of the Planet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rulers of the Planet[edit]

Rulers of the Planet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. I happened upon this article in my patrol of Category:Ireland articles needing attention. Per the concerns raised in a previous SPEEDY request (and the tags on the talkpage/etc), there is zero indication that this band meets the relevant notability criteria. In terms of WP:NBAND, the band doesn't appear to have charted anywhere. Ever. (Certainly there is no record of any chart placement in Ireland, or any awards or similar). In terms of WP:SIGCOV, the single Irish Examiner article (the ONLY ref in the article) was the first and ONLY time that the subject was covered in any depth by that newspaper. And, any coverage in the (other) Irish newspapers of record, like the Irish Times or Irish Independent are trivial passing mentions. And barely even that to be honest. As clear a case of why we have WP:TOOSOON guidelines as any I've seen. (The COI/SPA/PROMO overtones in the article's creation are also concerning). Guliolopez (talk) 20:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Is this notable? It's not that long, but it's still an album review. But aside from this, I did not found anything reliable other than the standard unreliable sites like Discogs, Facebook, Amazon, the site of their record label and stuff where the words appear separately. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ 22:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.