Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rui Roentgen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 22:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rui Roentgen[edit]
If you get down to the bottom it turns out he's involved with a television program of some sort. This is still not sufficiently encyclopedic, and 99% of the information in the article is unverifiable (see the relevant policy). Chick Bowen 22:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure, 100% vanity. _-M
oP-_ 22:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Weak delete. Doesn't seem notable to me, but does have an imdb entry. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity autobiography; no sources cited (imdb linked in previous entry seems to be someone else?) Bucketsofg 00:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, that link is definitely him. another imdb link - very similar material to this here article. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Too similar. Even if Rui submitted that bio to IMDB himself, I don't think it can be licensed under the GFDL, since IMDB holds the copyright, and too much of the wording is in common. I'm coming closer to speedying this thing. Chick Bowen 01:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, that link is definitely him. another imdb link - very similar material to this here article. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no sign of notability --Ajdz 05:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - IMDB entry not enough for an article. Not notability and big concerns in regards to how verifiable it is.--Cini 08:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Even given every word in the article as perfect truth, none of it is sufficient to establish notability. Maybe if the show it says he's been picked to host becomes notable, he would deserve mention in its article, but he's not notable by himself for anything. — Saxifrage ✎ 11:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. MCB 04:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as vanity. porges 06:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.