Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhr in Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arfæst! 14:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhr in Love[edit]

Ruhr in Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s) in spite of continuing to edit. Concern was: No indication of significance. An article about an event unsupported by multiple, independent, reliable sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You removed my autopatroller rights over this? Vindictive much? Did you try doing any research, kudpung? If you didn't, really no reason to demolish the house while it's still being built. Stubs are beautiful and useful, not trash to be erased without a second thought. Earflaps (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Like most big festivals, especially raves, this has left a trail of press reports about the size of the crowds and the drug busts. The coverage is regional rather than national, but has enabled me to add some facts and figures and demonstrate that it's not all press releases and not all about this year. It's also one of the three brands highlighted when the event organizer was acquired last year. As such I think it squeaks by GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 14:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was so close to !voting keep, but I can't in good conscience. The article doesn't appear to be significant and encyclopedia worthy. --ceradon (talkcontribs) 14:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The article is not in a good shape, but the subject is one of the more relevant electronic music festivals in Germany. Lots of coverage, mostly regional or in music press, but then again, WAZ is one of the largest newspapers in Germany. --PanchoS (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Annual event. And that's a big crowd in the picture.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.