Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruelle (group)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh666 02:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruelle (group)[edit]

Ruelle (group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy musical notability. No references. Google search finds only the usual vanity hits. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I can certainly understand why the article was initially nominated for deletion, given its poor state at that time. Now, I'm not the original creator of the article, but I've greatly expanded it from that state and added references, and I believe in its newer, current, expanded state, the notability of the subject has been established, and that this article is a clear keep. —Lowellian (reply) 23:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I was the original creator, and yes the original article I put up was poor and I had planned to go back to it, but it slipped the mind. Good to see the article has been expanded and that the notability has been recognised as it should as Lowellian has mentioned with her work on television shows.— Chriscore (talk) 23:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) 18:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.