Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Moise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy Moise[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful political candidate Rathfelder (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not rise to a level of notability for stand alone article in relation to military service, acting or politics. Wikipedia is not a newspaper; trivial. Kierzek (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:NPOL. Post 2013 (i.e. after the failed bid) seems to be limited to [1][2] which does not seem to rise to GNG.Icewhiz (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject clearly satisfies WP:GNG and is also a bit more than just a soldier and politician having produced and acted in films, though the subject has been geared to highlight it’s unsuccessful political campaign. Savvyjack23 (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete a failed candidate for a nomination, who has nothing else that adds up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep By a quick overview of the article, person does seem to have notability enough to sustain its own article. --Navarre0107 (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment doesn't meet WP:ENT, WP:SOLDIER, or WP:NPOL. I don't think the coverage in The Haitian Americans is enough to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG on its own. If the article is kept, it should be written in a way that avoids being simply a laundry-list of degrees and publicity stunts. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist^un Eins ^uno 17:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Passes WP:NPOL. "In April 2014, Moise was appointed Ambassador-at-Large by Haitian president Michel Martelly to promote investments in Haiti." Please review recent changes to article. Thanks. Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to withdraw. Rathfelder (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I object to a withdrawal; "Ambassador-at-Large" isn't a title with inherent notability, it seems like more of an honorary title than one with any actual meaning. It certainly doesn't meet NPOL. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Moise's broad range of activities and their independent coverage, including for his support of Haiti and its culture, support his notability. —ADavidB 18:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.