Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudrabbumi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudrabbumi[edit]

Hoax. No reliable sources. Redtigerxyz (talk) 08:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Redtigerxyz (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- While I am not convinced it is a hoax (there is a place called Rudrabumi which might be what's meant) but the article does not establish notability, and I can't find any decent sources to justify keeping this thing. Reyk _YO! 09:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 04:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In a way it is a hoax because its strong POV cannot be supported by evidence (one of the holiest places...). Despite that it still doesn't have any reliable sources to show it notability. Gizza^Discuss ^© 23:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.