Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudra soni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. Sam Walton (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra soni[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tried to speedy this under G11 but the article creator (almost certainly) used an IP address to remove the deletion tag so now must bring here to AfD. The kid has been in a bunch of commercials, apparently. No evidence of notability has been established. I suspect COI editing, and certainly bad faith editing. (Notes: the Bollywood Life ref. is to a self-proclaimed gossip magazine, which I am going to doubt has much in the way of editorial oversight, and the Tellychakar ref appears to be hear-say only; the other two refs are IMdB cites, which means no independence, which leaves nothing.) KDS4444 (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete'. Minor coverage, no main roles (IMDb has a single entry). WP:TOOSOON to be in an encyclopedia. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.