Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubbers 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbers 7[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article. No evidence of notability in over ten years since it was created. - Xexerss (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect to Sukune Inugami~~ Delete per nom. I couldn't find any sources and the series wasn't licensed outside of Asia so sources are unlikely to exist. Link20XX (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: changed vote to delete per recent developments. Link20XX (talk) 03:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While a lack of sources in English is not a reason to delete an article, it does not appear that any sources exist in Japanese either. The jawiki article is completely unsourced and Japanese language searches did not give me any results with sigcov. I would also oppose redirecting to the author because I believe that she is also not notable and I will be nominating her article for deletion as well. Mlb96 (talk) 03:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.