Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RtlCreateUserThread

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 23:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RtlCreateUserThread[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was PROD but contributor removed the tag, API calls are not of themselves notable, and the article does not provide any indication this call is exceptional. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is part of the undocumented Windows NT kernel API, but I don't see how it merits an article. I can't even recommend a redirect to Architecture of Windows NT, it wouldn't make any sense. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 22:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - and as much as per nom is frowned upon, the nomination summarizes succincly the case for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTMANUAL. 1292simon (talk) 05:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real way that this random command can be developed into an article. It is not particularly significant and, as a computer command, has not received news coverage. Marechal Ney (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.