Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rt. Rev. Clifton Daniel III
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A Train take the 17:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rt. Rev. Clifton Daniel III[edit]
Non-notable, fandom. Akihabara 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Most of it is pure garbage (i.e., the part about God being a North Carolina fan, etc.) Even if it were cleaned up, though, there's still no proper assertion of notability. Heimstern Läufer 08:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete NN, fluff, etc.SkierRMH,08:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and SkierRHM as a non-notable, POV, extreme vanity article that fails WP:RS and WP:V. NeoFreak 19:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, believe it or not. It's a pile of nonsense right now, but he is an ECUSA diocesan and so notable. I've added it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anglicanism and will rewrite it. -- Bpmullins | Talk 22:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Bpmullins, although as has been noted elsewhere, it should also be moved so that the article name does not include his Style. David Underdown 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Bpmullins. WikiProject Anglicanism is trying to add, clean up, and expand articles on diocesan bishops. Carolynparrishfan 15:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.