Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. @Narky Blert: You can go ahead with the suggested follow-up. Sandstein 18:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Royden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE search turned up only a link to hxxp://dyingscene.com/bands/royden/ (live link blocked by the Wiki spam filter) and an AllMusic biography. I am prepared to give some weight to professional AllMusic reviews, but the one linked here is by a freelancer, and I give it no weight at all. Fails WP:NBAND. Narky Blert (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page Best Friends Our Worst Enemies, because it is an album by Royden, and I can find no sign of notability for it either.

Note to closer. If the article about the band Royden is deleted then:

Royden (disambiguation) will need to be moved into the empty space, keeping the redirect.
The lead of Royden (disambiguation) will need editing to delete the no-longer WP:PTOPIC. Narky Blert (talk) 22:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no WP:RS to indicate notability nor claims in the article that would indicate it. Nom's due diligence seems sound. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.