Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal restrooms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Royal restrooms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party refeerences (only referenced to the website of the company itself). A brief Google search has found nothing but business listings, and the only claim of notability in the article is that they operate in 15 states of USA. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be written like an advertisement and I am not sure it meats WP:Notability - Delete Radioactiveplayful (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cameron11598 (Converse) 20:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I as able to find this article but that's it. Insufficient for notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient evidence of notability in secondary sources (news, journal articles, reliable web sites). Although this company has written much about itself on the web, multiple reliable sources, independent of the subject, are not available. - tucoxn\^talk 22:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertisement/business listing (WP:NOTYELLOW) Ansh666 21:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.