Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Mara Safari Lodge (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Royal Mara Safari Lodge[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Royal Mara Safari Lodge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of coverage from reliable sources. Most of the article (including all sources cited) only refers to the Masai Mara and not to the hotel/lodge. snigbrook (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable, reads like a booklet of a travel agency. Dewritech (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete terribly written. Not even up to travel booklet standards. Too many peacock phrases, too few relevant references.--SPhilbrickT 18:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not notable and/or no sources to support. --Sulmues Let's talk 19:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.