Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Reynolds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roxy Reynolds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Niche awards not sufficient to meet pornbio and fails the gng by a mile. Even if we accepted the awards we should not host a blp with poor sourcing. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The award in question, Urban X/Urban Spice, has never satisfied WP:PORNBIO by itself as a "well-known and significant industry award," niche category or not. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem to meet project notability guides at this time. ValarianB (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Urban Spice/X Awards fail the "well-known/significant" test. The Maxim- related claim can't be verified and wouldn't amount to significant coverage anyway. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.