Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowland Private Island

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 20:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rowland Private Island[edit]

Rowland Private Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't determine that this island even exists. Possible hoax. Tchaliburton (talk) 07:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless it's improved. No evidence to indicate notability. Sure, I own a car, but that's not a Wikipedia article. — kikichugirl inquire 07:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's no evidence that this place exists. Andrew D. (talk) 12:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as evidence of it even existing, If it does by a miracle exist there's nothing to suggest it does.... –Davey2010(talk) 20:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No trace of this island found in search. If it's not a hoax, it's extremely non-notable. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.