Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 66 (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 05:50Z

Route 66 (film)[edit]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Stifle (talk) 20:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cars (film). Route 66 was the planned title of Cars. TTV|talk|contribs|email 23:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This does not seem to be correct. Or rather, if it was, they are now planning on using that title for another movie per [1] & [2] among others. Whether there are enough sources to justify an article on this planned movie, I'll leave to others, but it shouldn't be redirected to Cars. -- JLaTondre 23:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment Well, it was in Variety which makes it a source, however, I'm not sure that this film is going to be made. I do think some sort of redirect to Cars would be appropriate, but if this movie ever pans out, that would have to take precedence. Not going to say keep or delete, but I could go either way. FrozenPurpleCube 07:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by nom, there is far too little info on this film to create an article. Maybe in a few years, when the status is clearer... — QuantumEleven 08:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cars (film) since Route 66 was its working name. This does not warrant its own article on Wikipedia since they are both the same thing. Ter e nc e Ong 08:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A redirect will cause confusion with the {{DreamWorks animated films}} template. If the closing admin chooses to redirect, they should fix that template so that people are not directed to an article that has no bearing on the link they are clicking. -- JLaTondre 13:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A 2010 release? Do we really need this now? Wavy G 22:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cars (film --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This should not be redirected to Cars (film), because it has nothing to do with it and if it will be made, will be made by Dreamworks, not Disney. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.180.205.82 (talk • contribs).
Delete, do not redirect. If it's a real film, a redirect will just cause confusion in the future. --- RockMFR 14:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.