Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostrevor Baptist Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Rostrevor, South Australia. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rostrevor Baptist Church[edit]

fails WP:ORG, almost no coverage (and 2 of these articles are trivial) [1] LibStar (talk) 13:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Rostrevor, South Australia unless sources which establish notability are found. I looked for myself and couldn't find any useful sources. --Explodicle (T/C) 15:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Rostrevor, South Australia. It is my opinion that small town churches are important enough to the town to be covered in the town's article. (A given church in a small town is attended by a significant percentage of the town's population where as any given church in a large city is only attended by a tiny percentage of the city. Thus including it is not undue weight for a small town, but would be for a larger one.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What percentage of the town goes to this church? I don't think we should make any assumptions about attendance without a source. --Explodicle (T/C) 21:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is true that it is hard to find independent sources, this church is notable both for its growth against trend and influence within the Adelaide Christian community. Regarding the merge request - Rostrevior is not a small town - it's a suburb, and the church's congregation is neither a significant portion of the suburb, nor close to exclusively from the suburb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter.thejackos (talk • contribs) 08:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if it is hard to find independent sources then it fails WP:GNG and should be deleted. A church being notable in a community is not sufficient reason for being kept. LibStar (talk) 09:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the place where it is presumably Rostrevor, South Australia. This is usally the best solution for local churches. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.