Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rossella Visconti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rossella Visconti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Porn star with no coverage by reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Fails WP:PORNBIO without awards. A7 speedy declined. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability and unreliable sources should not prevent an A7. I'm frankly astronished this wasn't toast at CSD. Anyhow, no evidence subject passed PORNBIO or GNG so auto fail for a BLP. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Because starring in a bunch of titles is an assertion of notability. PORNBIO is a matter for slow deletion, and A7 isn't appropriate. -- Y not? 01:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - If starring in said films is no indication of notability - which it isn't as starring in a bunch of titles isn't in PORNBIO - then no it shouldnt be taken as an assertion of notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the tow above reasons. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 18:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. (I would also add that I find the article creator's chosen nom de guerre of "The Hitmakers" to be suggestive of a possible COI account used to promote non-notable bios, and that its contrib history does little to dispel that notion.) Pax 06:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "Starring in porn films" is not a criteria of any notability guide to be found in this project. Tarc (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A not notable porn actress.User:Lucifero4
Delete Fails PORNBIO. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.