Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshan Bikram Thakuri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roshan Bikram Thakuri[edit]

Roshan Bikram Thakuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable Film director. Most of the sources which are provided are non-rs. And the international film award which is mentioned here[1] is about the film not directly to the director and the director doesn't meet WP:BIO and is WP:TOOSOON to be here on Wikipedia. DIVINE (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Dear DIVINE, thanks for bring in the issues here, I reviewed and checked all the references on the base of your aforementioned statement to delete the articles. Everything seems up to date with reliable information backed by references. Could you rather mention what need to be improved and add apart from nominating here for deletion. Every contribution matters, I will appreciate yours. Also, please make sure it's not a aftermath of these conversations backed by your personal outburst. Thanks - Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is the deletion discussion and the sources that you have provided on the articles don't meet WP:RS. Even before XFD, I tried to find some sources in either the Nepali language or English and didn't find any that supported the notability of the director per WP:DIRECTOR. If you do have some sources then you are free to add to the article and remove Nnn-RsSPR kinds of stuff too. DIVINE (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 21:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Would like to hear some more opinions on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The main problem with the sources cited in the article is that although they briefly mention Thakuri, they don't discuss him "directly and in detail" as the GNG requires. (Some are also of dubious reliability, as noted above.) My searches didn't find any coverage that would move the needle in terms of notability, and I'm not seeing a strong argument that WP:NCREATIVE is met, so he doesn't seem to be notable at this time, though that may of course change in the future. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.