Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemount International School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was an easy redirect to Siglap (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemount International School[edit]

Rosemount International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a contested PROD. It is an article about a kindergarten and primary school in Singapore. There is nothing in the article to suggest it will meet WP:GNG. Based on the current contents of the article, I suggest a redirect to either Siglap or East Region, Singapore, per the standard outcome described in Wikipedia:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 06:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 06:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 06:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per nomination. Schools at this level are rarely notable and this one doesn't establish notability at all. clpo13(talk) 06:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per nom unless/until third-party coverage pops up. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Siglap per long-standing precedent stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. –Davey2010Talk 19:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The page has already been updated with credible sources. Shazrinarmk2015 (talk) 00:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.