The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems quite unremarkable, nothing of note asserted. Akihabara 06:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 06:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - gsearch didn't come up with anything notable happening here. SkierRMH,08:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Shimeru 06:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
