Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roscoe Dsane
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 21:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Roscoe Dsane[edit]
Non-notable footballer, never played at professional level - fchd 20:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't play in a fully professional league. Catchpole 22:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I would tend to agree, but then it seems everyone who's kicked a ball in any league (including the Conference) has an inalienable right to a page nowadays. There seems to be a different set of rules applied to football articles for notability. Bubba hotep 23:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the standards are the same; its just that there are a lot of fans out there who want their players to have articles. BlueValour 00:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 00:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:BIO. BlueValour 00:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - has an excellent name but unfortunately his career to date doesn't merit an article.... ChrisTheDude 08:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per BlueValour then! Bubba hotep 09:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per fchd and BlueValour. It's worth checking to see if any other AFCW players fail this criterion as well. Qwghlm 13:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- We have already checked some of them, but then again new articles do keep appearing. Punkmorten 13:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Angelo 17:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.