Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Girvan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural Keep. IP editors can nominate articles for AFD, as this one did, provided that they then have an editor or admin create the debate here and offer their rationale for deletion. This didn't happen here, so we have no nomination - and thus no AFD. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rory Girvan[edit]

This page should be kept as all points are clearly cited and relevant, including Spotlight and IMDB, widely respected actors pages. Additionally it has received a number of hits since its addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammysoutherner13 (talk • contribs) 2010/12/10 11:51:41

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, not because I think this article meets notability, but because this AfD nomination seems to be from an anonymous IP address without any reason. We can consider deletion if and someone properly nominates the article and states why. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep of an incomplete nomination, where even the nominator states "This page should be kept". Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.