Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roopa Mishra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roopa Mishra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NON notable,mid level bureaucrat! information stated is not needed for wikipedia! Uncletomwood (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 12:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep. Article holds importance for Wikipedia:WikiProject Odisha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr RD (talk • contribs) 19:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non administrator WikiProject India editor's observation) @Mr RD: the concern here is Notability. If you think the article is important, explain how and why? --Tito☸Dutta 19:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 06:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SpacemanSpiff 18:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no assertion of notability per Wikipedia guidelines let alone any substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article talks up initiaives within organisations while the subject has been in roles there, but, taking the most recent as an example, acting as project sponsor for an office work management implementation is hardly notable. No evidence of individual biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.