Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald G. Russell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. A rename for this target article can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald G. Russell[edit]

Ronald G. Russell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL as a former small-town mayor and federal judicial nominee. A possible redirect is Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies, where his WP:BLP1E is listed. Let'srun (talk) 00:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Law, and Utah. Let'srun (talk) 00:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete & redirect as article creator, per nomination. Safiel (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per above. - Indefensible (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. It seems this individual was eventually appointed to a state bench [1]. But that source is not independent and there is virtually no coverage on this state appointment, so ultimately doesn't affect the outcome here. —siroχo 07:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Is this really relevant for Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies? I mean, there was no controversy, the nomination just expired. Curbon7 (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point. Target article should probably be renamed to just "Barack Obama judicial nominees" or something like that. - Indefensible (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd probably include the word failed in there, but that is a discussion for the article talk page itself. Let'srun (talk) 00:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.