Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Smoorenburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹ 17:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Smoorenburg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability as an actor or martial artist not established. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree, fails WP:NACTOR Cannolis (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He lacks the coverage or achievements to meet WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, or WP:MANOTE. The only source is his own web page. Jakejr (talk) 00:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
G7 Delete Myself didnt found such coverage to establish notability. Derevation (talk) 11:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.