Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Mustafaa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Mustafaa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT. Non-active actor with only one significant role (as a character in the US adaptation of Skins) and very little to no significant coverage. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Policy officer with the school board is a "low-level functionary" to be blunt, non-notable bit parts in movies or TV otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The character he purportedly played in the US version Skins exists solely as a redirect to a different character in the UK version of Skins, but is not mentioned at all in that article to contextualize why it redirects there (I had to go to a completely different article to figure that out!) — and being a policy officer with a local school board is not a notability claim at all, so that does nothing whatsoever to lift his notability. Simply having had a television role is not an automatic notability freebie in and of itself; the notability test is not "article lists roles", but "article is referenced to reliable source coverage establishing the significance of said roles, such as analyzing his performances and/or showing that he won or was nominated for major acting awards for one or more of said roles". But there's none of that here. Bearcat (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:ENT as he has not had significant enough roles. Suonii180 (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.