Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimous consensus that this is unsourceable and likely original research. ~ mazca ^talk 23:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Brazilian[edit]

Started by a banned user, and zero evidence in independent sources that these people actually exist. Biruitorul ^Talk 19:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As either experiment or prank. Dahn (talk) 20:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. The statistic for the alleged population is uncited. --Folantin (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Can't locate any non-trivial WP:RS with typical Google searches like "Romanians * in Brazil/Sao Paolo", "Romenos * em Brasil/São Paulo". This article and its alleged population statistic seem like yet another one of these hoaxes about migration to Latin America (Iranians in Venezuela, Afghans in Chile, Vietnamese in Mexico, etc.) which various users/socks like to pollute Wikipedia with. cab (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the good reason mentioned. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research. Algébrico (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is probably original research and does not present RS. I am brazilian and I haven't been able to find any previous work about the subject. Lechatjaune (talk) 15:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.