Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Hills Preparatory School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Hills Preparatory School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent soyurce that cover the subject in sufficient detail to establish notability. Loew Galitz (talk) 17:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The fact it uses the old Navel Ship Yard housing might make it a good idea to merge it into that facilities article? Super (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Outside of various listing websites such as this one, a page with the school’s statistics, and non-notable coverage, there’s nothing notable about this school. Jobie James (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily enough references to satisfy WP:GNG as with any other secondary school in the western world. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Schools are not notable just because they exist. That is already the case since 2017. The Banner talk 14:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I found many sources through Google search. I've added a few of those to the article.Mommmyy (talk) 22:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
comment In order to establkish notablity we need independent sourcess which discuss school in detail, not routine local newspaper announcements about school events. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the WP:BEFORE I can find mainly listings and the own website. Nothing thatlook like WP:SIGCOV. The Banner talk 00:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All I could find is a couple of articles about a student from there who died and some other trivial name drops. From what I can tell there's nothing that would qualify as direct, in-depth coverage though. None of the references in the article cut it either. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Peter Ormond 💬 21:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.