Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolf Beeler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rolf Beeler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet WP:BIO and with no matches on Google News the issue of notability is unlikely to ever be addressed. Ash (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The nominator is incorrect in the statement about Google News. A current news search gets two hits and 21 of the hits from an archive search are about this Rolf Beeler, with most of them providing substantial coverage. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Concur with Phil Bridger that there are ample Google News hits and if one actualy reads the articles, it's quite clear the coverage is significant enough to establish notability. I'll also point to this book identifying him as a "highly regarded Swiss affineur". -- Whpq (talk) 14:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per coverage identified by Phil Bridger and Whpq. Blessed are the cheesemakers, for they shall survive AFDs. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Phil Bridger and Co. Warrah (talk) 13:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.