Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roleplayer (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Steve Jackson Games. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 07:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roleplayer (magazine)[edit]

Roleplayer (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company newsletter. (Not a magazine; no ISSN, and the article identifies it as "the company's periodical of choice to reach out to their fan base".) No references provided; no third-party references appear to be available. Does not meet criteria for notability. Mikeblas (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP: NMAGAZINE. Admiral Caius (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Pyramid_(magazine) where it is already mentioned. A sentence or two more would probably be a good idea in any case. Hobit (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as I found one good source; failing that, start a "Magazines" section in Steve Jackson Games and merge this there. BOZ (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all to Steve Jackson Games with a redirect containing the categories. I'd like to see it as a standalone but concerned a single source will open it to future AfDs and danger of loosing entirely. Safest place is a subsection in SJG -- if/when more source are available to justify a standalone it can be split off when it won't be in danger of NMAGAZINE. -- GreenC 17:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 05:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.