Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Ruby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Ruby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reference except for one from a local paper, no works of note. This is a short article littered with red links and hearsay but totally lacking in the area of reliable sources. Jacona (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The nominator's assessment is correct. We need more than one short article in a local newspaper to establish notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, absolutely not notable, should have been CsDd at birth. As should article on his album, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todavia Nos Queremos.TheLongTone (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Indeed fails GNG/BIO. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails BIO & GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even close to being notable, and WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.