Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roi.com.au
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 11:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Roi.com.au[edit]
- Roi.com.au (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searched Google.au and Wombat and I failed to locate WP:GNG for this business. There's nothing special about this start up that distinguish from other small businesses. The article is written like an ad and sourced almost entirely from its own contents. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 05:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article contains nothing to distinguish it from many other similar companies and verges on being too promotional. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Spam by stealth. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete plain WP:ADVERT. LibStar (talk) 10:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be spam. Nick-D (talk) 04:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.