Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohinton Kamakaka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WITHDRAWN, reliable source added. C1776M ^Talk 11:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rohinton Kamakaka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be a possible WP:COI biography of a non-notable living person with only a primary source. C1776M ^Talk 00:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-- meets WP:PROF#C1. His h-index appears to be about 48 (according to the Scholar H-Index Calculator on Google Scholar). His most cited paper has been cited 169 times on CrossRef and 327 on Scopus. These figures all ensure notability. Jinkinson talk to me 01:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I got an h-index of 29 rather than 48 when I counted by hand in a GS search, but that (with 12 papers cited over 100 times, in venues such as Nature, some as first author) still seems like enough for WP:PROF#C1 to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sounds great. I looked at GS, and the results on molecular biology are mostly greek to me. I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination once there's a reliable source. It was already PROPD-BLPd without adding a reliable source, so AfD was the only procedural option from my understanding. C1776M ^Talk 01:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on basis of GS h-index of 29 which passes WP:Prof#C1. Nominator's offer to withdraw is warmly accepted. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
- Does the link above to an article authored by the subject count as a reliable third-party source for the article? C1776M ^Talk 02:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@C1776M: No, but this probably does. Jinkinson talk to me 02:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.