Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogers Sportsnet

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

VfD 2004

was at : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion_archive_May_2004&oldid=3453001#Rogers_Sportsnet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.193.90 (talk) 10:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Keep

Article lised on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 29 to May 6 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Non-notable except that it is media and it exists. Falcon 03:30, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. A notable television channel. Everyking 04:00, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I tend to feel that the media, at least, is inherently notable. Isomorphic 04:04, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, this is like one of the only channels I watch on TV! :) Adam Bishop 04:33, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Think before you nominate such a major subject. You're wasting everybody's time with this, Falcon. -- user:zanimum
  • You're even Canadian, seeing your user page. -- user:zanimum
• Maybe the Rogers building down the street is exerting some kind of control over my brain, but I say Keep. --Phil Larin 17:04, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, we have many articles on television stations. - SimonP 18:21, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
• I've removed the channel assignments (Canada, believe it or not, actually has more than two cable providers!), but otherwise the article is entirely legitimate. Of course, like Phil Larin, I live within view of the Rogers building. But it's still absolutely relevant. Bearcat 07:07, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I've expanded the article a bit. Rdash (t) 20:28, May 2, 2004 (UTC)

• To whoever keeps editing the page and putting insults.. give it up you immature son of a bitch!--Mcmlxxviii 21:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Whats the big idea removing the Forum part of the page?

Sportsnet.ca has a forum that everyone participates in, So why remove it? it's factual..??? --Mcmlxxviii 23:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

End discussion

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.