Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Elkin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Roger Elkin[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roger Elkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article doesn't show evidence of WP:GNG. The two listed sources consist of a link to a Google search and a single line reference in an old poetry quarterly, neither of which demonstrate notability. I'm also deeply sceptical about the notability/existence of some of the listed awards, ie "The Sylvia Plath Award for Poems about Women (1986)". JonnyDKeen (talk) 18:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete article doesn't cite any reliable sources and I can't find anything would establish notability. Colonestarrice (talk) 20:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.