Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 09:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodrigo (footballer, born 1999)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and barely passes WP:NFOOTY due to a Campeonato Paranaense appearance. Has no further professional career after this, and has no significant coverage whatsoever. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - played in Campeonato Paranaense last season, and article says he is still playing, so what's the issue? We have always given more leeway to young players with active careers. Giant Snowman 11:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Passing WP:NFOOTY only means that the subject is likely to meet the general notability guideline. He still has to meet it and if there is no WP:SIGCOV then he fails, as is the case here. Alvaldi (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GS. Already one fully-pro appearance and is only 22 years old. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per all for now, passes NFOOTY. Zackdasnicker (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pass WP:NFOOTY. Sonofstar (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If he's not going to have a professional career beyond this then any leeway traditionally given to young players should be moot, right? None of the "Keep, passes NFOOTY" !votes have presented any evidence of SIGCOV, which is a must per NSPORT. JoelleJay (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.