Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, with cheers for improving the article.--Kubigula (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory[edit]

Article does not assert context for notability per WP:N. Article reads like an advert, and was obviously written by somone connected to the subject. JERRY ^talk _contribs 15:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I say, based on the articles shown in Google News as posted here; [1]. In addition, there were more than just a few hits in Google Scholar as posted here, [2], which makes for a pretty strong keep argument. Happy New Year. Shoessss | Chat 17:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remark It seems mainly to be a copy and paste from the RMBO website, eg the education section is from www.rmbo.org/education. The words 'we' and 'our' are prominent throughout. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 20:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If that is the case, Tag it for copyright violation. However, I believe that the organization itself still deserves an entry in Wikipedia. If necessary I'll start the piece myself and get some help in cleaning it up. You want to volunteer :-). In the mean time,I will check it later tonight and see what is going on. Thanks for your input Shoessss | Chat 20:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - significant media coverage Addhoc (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.