Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockerball April Championships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 13:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rockerball April Championships[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strong delete. Absolute rubbish. Adds no value and certainly does not comply with WP:Notability. No citations. Could even be a hoax. --Jack | ^{talk page} 21:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a hoax. Has citations. I dispute the "Absolute rubbish" above. Nominator does not st[at]e how it "certainly does not comply with WP:Notability". ~~burden of proof on nominator~~ --RockerballAustralia (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd still like to see proof that it fails notability--RockerballAustralia (talk) 04:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt Rockerball was deleted three years ago and has been recreated (see new AFD here btw). Googling produces hits on a video-- that's it. I'd say that the creator has a COI, too. Mangoe (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Move to my user space so it improved and appropriate sources (offline or online) found --RockerballAustralia (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I cannot find any reliable third party sources discussing this sport. Although the article seems to have been created in good faith it is just not notable yet. Mah favourite (talk) 07:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.