Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robots 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. Owen× ☎ 18:39, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Robots 2[edit]
The article claims there are no plans for a sequel to the original movie, therefore the article itself is not needed. 203.213.7.133 12:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:NOT. PJM 13:43, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, although perhaps there should be more Wikipedia articles about things that have not happened, will not happen, did not exist and are not true. Think of the possibilities! Peeper 14:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A classic example of an article rendering itself moot. 23skidoo 17:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we could also have articles about Harry Potter 9 and someone who will not be the next American president, but if they're not planned there's no verifiable info to make an article with. (Note: This nomination shows me we shouldn't ban anons from nominating. Well done!) - Mgm|(talk) 21:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above, and let us please pray there is no sequel, the first one was horrible. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Former version was a hoax, current one is pointless. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 22:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per CSD:A3. Stifle 00:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.