Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Bladimir (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar 20:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Bladimir[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Award is a local award from a web development/SEO company, not a social welfare related organization. Looks like an attempt to provide Wikipedia based advertising for individual. reddogsix (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless significant additional sources are presented to establish notability; if they are, then rewrite thoroughly. Note this has been speedy deleted previously under G11 (Blatantly promotional) and has been tagged for G11 again. DES ^(talk) 14:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. May fail WP:GNG since the subject of the article does not have significant coverage. The two sources are based on one source that may not be reliable. The article was speedily deleted on 17 July and has since been recreated. However, it remains promotional and does not contain substantial content to show the notability of the subject as a preacher. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient evidence of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The refs are nothing more than mentions. The claim that he helps thousands to get their food is not explained or proved. Peridon (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've declined the G11 speedy deletion request — not because it doesn't qualify, but because the inevitable deletion here at AFD will be firmer, "stickier", more significant (or whatever you want to call it) than a speedy deletion as spam. If someone creates another article on him after one spam speedy and one AFD for notability, and the new page is deleted, it will probably be salted, but that might not happen if the two previous deletions were both un-discussed spam deletions. Nyttend (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as much as I hate to agree with reddogsix, the subject does not meet the notability requirements, I found no secondary sources to support the article's retention. Wayne Jayes (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable, even assuming everything in the stub is true. This is patently an advertisement for a charity, but Wikipedia is not a web host for do-gooders. In fact, according to the Silver Rule, if 100 Wikipedians insisted on being fed by this man, three meals a day, in perpetuity, we would be taking away food for the needy, which he would no doubt feel is unfair. Bearian (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Sounds NN to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete it may simply be WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:32, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Highbeam and Questia searches return nothing, Google returns nothing substantial, including the already-cited references from a site which invites user-submitted content. No evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.