Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Jacoby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Jacoby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likes a literal translation of http://portal.educ.ar/noticias/entrevistas/roberto-jacoby-no-hay-tecnolog-1.php a coyrighted spanish page and promotional text Esteban (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 15. Snotbot t • c » 19:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google Books turns up a significant number of references to Jacoby's pioneering work in media-based art. I've added a couple of these to the article. AllyD (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google and Google Books both provide plenty of good references in English to attest to his importance in Argentinian art, never mind the Spanish-language sources. The flagged potential copyvio is trivial - a brief, loose translation of some basic and readily-available information regarding when and where he was born and who he is. I'm seeing no reason to delete this. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ ^talk 12:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.